The provocation pannelliana, and misunderstandings between results
Published December 13, 2010 by freedom
- It 's enough that Marco Pannella asked, provocatively, permission to talk with Berlusconi to unleash yet another aggressive campaign of disinformation at the expense radicals. The uninformed (the regime is said to Torre Argentina), have been clumsily translated dishonestly and the desire of non-violent dialogue with everyone, even the worst, in a non-existent attempt commercialization of the votes in the Chamber of Deputies radicals. Little details have been awarded to Emma Bonino, Rita Bernardini, the same panel. Still, the radical approach of dialogue should be already seen and heard, even obvious, if the years of lead even addressed to "fellow assassins" of red terrorism: it is the same non-violent method that leads Marco to jeopardize their lives to save those of Tarek Aziz and Other Cain Iraqis.
Today, more modestly, attempting a dialogue with the Democratic Party. Despite the fine words of Bersani eighth Congress of the Italian Radicals and those in the ninth Rosi Bindi, the road is still very much uphill. By piddina, antiradical practices are now a constant: the prohibition of its application to the secretary of the party Pannella, vetoes the election symbol and three of his radical exponents (Pannella, D'Elia, Viale), blocking the RAI supervisory committee, the hollow and fake anagrafe public membership of the elect, elections for the secretary and youth opaque polluted by fraud (as evidenced by the radical candidate Giulia Innocenzi ), the betrayal of the resounding electoral arrangements in the European elections last year, the shameless commercialization of the Democratic Party to the Treaty between Italy and Libya and the deletion of part of the Bill Alfano that would ease the terrible disaster and inhuman Italian prison, sad story in which the Democratic Party, not the radicals, he has found convergence with the PDL on the issue with Libyan jails on the Northern League.
So, when you can get some seat (see Copasir) the PD does not stop at nothing, not even the corpses products from the oasis of Kufra camp or any tragic Italian prison. But the "fellow" Democrats will not stop there. The Democratic Party was careful, in fact, the radicals involved in the debate on the motion of no confidence in the Prime Minister. The result is an obvious consequence, namely the lack of signature of the radical Members of the motion.
Here you enter, temporally, provocation pannelliana. The dialogue with Berlusconi, of course, is impossible and Pannella aware. The reform of the justice from prison (not to mention the responsibility civil magistrates, the separation of careers, the abolition of mandatory prosecution), and majority single-member electoral reform, the radical vision of civil rights is something infinitely far to the Knight in disarray, whose last gasps of Liberalism now go back to the nineties. Berlusconi, although in agreement with some radical demands of justice, is now entirely unable not only to achieve them, but even feared.
Yet, just the mere intention to dialogue with the radical PDL to spark an uproar, primarily between militants and supporters. But if the method is the Gandhian ahimsa, if we turn not to the terrorists, this time, but the presidency as an institution (albeit poorly represented by the current occupant), as might be shocked? How can you criticize the statement by Pannella if it asks nothing but the status for the radical, "political parties" and is willing to have it recognized by anyone, Berlusconi Bersani, by Bossi Di Pietro? And how do those who are or could be radical?
pannelliana The provocation has had two immediate effects: first, the resumption of dialogue with Pierluigi Bersani and the Democratic Party, who, once again, the opportunity to try to become the left-liberal "English" so desired, and secondly, the announcement of Mark's trip to Iraq, accompanied by Foreign Minister, to save not only the life of Tariq Aziz and other dozens of death row inmates, but the truth about the real causes of the bloody war in Iraq. Especially the second result does not seem negligible in Italy that, as Wikileaks shows, on the international stage is increasingly marginal, and clownish.
0 comments:
Post a Comment